Comparative Analysis of Keypoint Detection Performance in SIFT Implementations on Small-Scale Image Datasets

  • Arif Rahman UAD
  • Suprihatin
  • Imam Riadi
  • Tawar
  • Furizal
Abstract views: 3 , PDF downloads: 5
Keywords: SIFT, Keypoint, Image, OpenSIFT, VLFeat

Abstract

Scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) is widely used as an image local feature extraction method because of its invariance to rotation, scale, and illumination change. SIFT has been implemented in different program libraries. However, studies that analyze the performance of SIFT implementations have not been conducted. This study examines the keypoint extraction of three well-known SIFT libraries, i.e., David Lowe's implementation, OpenSIFT, and vlSIFT in vlfeat. Performance analysis was conducted on multiclass small-scale image datasets to capture the sensitivity of keypoint detection. Although libraries are based on the same algorithm, their performance differs slightly. Regarding execution time and the average number of keypoints detected in each image, vlSIFT outperforms David Lowe’s library and OpenSIFT.

References

D. G. Lowe, “Object recognition from local scale-invariant features,” Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 1150–1157 vol.2, 1999, doi: 10.1109/ICCV.1999.790410.

D. G. Lowe, “Distinctive image features from scale invariant keypoints,” International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 60, pp. 91–11020042, 2004, doi: 10.1023/B:VISI.0000029664.99615.94.

Z. Wang, Y. Liu, J. Zhang, C. Fan, and H. Zhang, “Interference image registration combined by enhanced scale-invariant feature transform characteristics and correlation coefficient,” J Appl Remote Sens, vol. 16, no. 2, p. 26508, 2022.

S. Joseph, I. Hipiny, H. Ujir, S. F. S. Juan, and J. L. Minoi, “Performance evaluation of SIFT against common image deformations on iban plaited mat motif images,” Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1470–1477, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.11591/ijeecs.v23.i3.pp1470-1477.

P. Selvaraj and M. Karuppiah, “Enhanced copy-paste forgery detection in digital images using scale-invariant feature transform,” IET Image Process, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 462–471, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1049/iet-ipr.2019.0842.

M. Kasiselvanathan, V. Sangeetha, and A. Kalaiselvi, “Palm pattern recognition using scale invariant feature transform,” International Journal of Intelligence and Sustainable Computing, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 44–52, 2020.

R. Hess, “An open-source siftlibrary,” in Proceedings of the 18th ACM international conference on Multimedia, 2010, pp. 1493–1496.

I. Rey Otero and M. Delbracio, “Anatomy of the SIFT Method,” Image Processing On Line, vol. 4, pp. 370–396, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.5201/ipol.2014.82.

M. Y. Yin, F. Guan, P. Ding, and Z. F. Liu, “Implementation of image matching algorithm based on SIFT features,” in Applied Mechanics and Materials, Trans Tech Publications Ltd, 2014, pp. 3181–3184. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.602-605.3181.

E. Yang, F. Chen, M. Wang, H. Cheng, and R. Liu, “Local Property of Depth Information in 3D Images and Its Application in Feature Matching,” Mathematics, vol. 11, no. 5, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.3390/math11051154.

Y. Gu, H. Wang, Y. Bie, R. Yang, and Y. Li, “Research on Image Registration of Different Wavebands Based on SIFT Algorithm,” in 2022 3rd China International SAR Symposium (CISS), 2022, pp. 1–5.

D. G. Lowe, “The SIFT Keypoint Detector,” 2005 [Online]. Available: https://www.cs.ubc.ca/~lowe/keypoints/.

R. Hess, “OpenSIFT: An Open-Source SIFT Library,” 2012 [Online]. Available: https://robwhess.github.io/opensift/.

A. Vedaldi and B. Fulkerson, “VLFeat - An open and portable library of computer vision algorithms,” Proceedings of the international conference on Multimedia - MM ’10, p. 1469, 2010, doi: 10.1145/1873951.1874249.

A. Krizhevsky, “Learning Multiple Layers of Features from Tiny Images,” 2009.

L. N. Darlow, E. J. Crowley, A. Antoniou, and A. J. Storkey, “CINIC-10 Is Not ImageNet or CIFAR-10.” 2018 [Online]. Available: https://datashare.is.ed.ac.uk/

PlumX Metrics

Published
2024-12-30