Komparasi Kinerja ELECTRE dan MOORA dalam Menentukan Konsentrasi Tingkat Kesuburan Sperma

Ahmadi Irmansyah Lubis, Feri Setiawan, Lusiyanti Lusiyanti

Abstract


The aim of this research is to test and compare the performance of the ELECTRE method with MOORA in decision making. By using the attribute weighting process, namely the calculation of Information Gain in both methods, the attribute weights are obtained systematically and objectively, therefore they are no longer determined by the assumptions of decision makers. The test data instrument used is a dataset from the UCI Machine Learning Repository, namely the Fertility Dataset which is data on the level of sperm fertility concentration with 100 data records, 9 attributes, 1 class variable and the data set is multivariate. The results of testing the ELECTRE and MOORA methods in this study indicate that the two methods have differences in the results of ranking the best alternative for sperm fertility concentration levels. The ELECTRE method produces A2 as the best alternative, while the MOORA method produces A16 as the best alternative. Then in terms of program execution time, the MOORA method is faster, namely 0.02 seconds, while the ELECTRE method execution time is 1.88 seconds.


Keywords


decision making; electre; moora; information gain; sperm fertility

Full Text:

PDF

References


A.I.Lubis,P.Sihombing,andE.B.Nababan."ComparisonSAWandMOORAMethodswithAttributeWeightingUsingRankOrderCentroidinDecisionMaking".20203rdInternationalConferenceonMechanical,Electronics,Computer,andIndustrialTechnology(MECnIT).pp.127-131.2020.[2]M.NashrullahIrfan,G.Abdillah,andF.Renaldi,“SistemPendukungKeputusanuntukRekomendasiPromosiJabatan,”SistemPendukungKeputusan,vol.5,no.1,pp.196–201,2015.[3]S.Wardani,I.Parlina,andA.Revi,“AnalisisPerhitunganMetodeMooraDalamPemilihanSupplierBahanBangunandiTokoMegahGracindoJaya,”JurnalNasionalInformatikadanTeknologiJaringan.,vol.3,no.1,pp.95–99,2018.[4]H.S.Utama,D.Rosiyadi,D.Aridarma,andB.S.Prakoso,“SentimenAnalisisKebijakanGanjilGenapDiTolBekasiMenggunakanAlgoritmaNaiveBayesDenganOptimalisasiInformationGain,”JurnalPilarNusaMandiri,vol.15,no.2,pp.247–254,2019.[5]S.R.Ningsih,I.S.Damanik,I.Gunawan,andW.Saputra,“SistemPendukungKeputusandenganMenggunakanMetodeElectredalamMenentukanPenerimaProgram(PIP)melaluiKartuIndonesiaPintar(KIP):StudiKasusSDSwastaAl-WashliyahMoho,Simalungun,”KonferensiNasionalTeknologiInformasidanKomputasi,vol.1,no.1,pp.264–275,2017.[6]B.Satria,“PenerapanMetodeElectreSebagaiSistemPendukungKeputusanDalamPenerimaanBeasiswa,”vol.3814,pp.1–6,2017.[7]S.Alvita,N.Intan,F.Syahputra,K.Ulfa,andG.L.Ginting,“SistemPendukungKeputusanPemilihanMekanikSepedaMotorTerbaikMenggunakanMetodeMultiObjectiveOptimizationonTheBasisofRatioAnalysis(MOORA),”vol.5,no.1,pp.66–70,2018.[8]A.I.Lubis,F.Setiawan,andLusiyanti,“PenentuanPeringkatKonstentrasiTingkatKesuburanSpermaMenggunakanMetodeMOORA,”vol.1,no.2,pp.1–6,2021.[9]Y.F.Waruwu,M.Zarlis,E.B.Nababan,andM.S.Ziliwu,“SeleksiAtributPadaAlgoritmaRadialBasisFunctionNeuralNetworkMenggunakanInformationGain,”vol.9986,no.September,pp.21–24,2018.[10]S.Sundari,S.M.Sinaga,I.S.Damanik,andA.Wanto,“SistemPendukungKeputusanPemilihanPesertaOlimpiadeMatematikaSMASwastaTeladanPematangsiantarDenganMetodeElectre,”SeminarNasionalTeknologiKomputerSains,pp.793–799,2019.[11]P.Sianturi,M.Mesran,P.Ramadhani,andN.W.Al-Hafiz,“SistemPendukungKeputusanPenentuanPenerimaBantuanOperasionalPenyelengaraan(Bop)Paud(PendidikanAnakUsiaDini)MenerapkanMetodeElectre(StudiKasus:DinasPendidikanKabupatenSimalungun),”KOMIK(KonferensiNasionalTeknologiInformasidanKomputer),vol.I,no.1,pp.20–26,2017.[12]E.Suryani,“SistemPendukungKeputusanPenerimaBantuanSiswaMiskinMenerapkanMetodeWASPASdanMOORA,”SeminarNasionalSainsTeknologiInformasi,pp.719–727,2018.[13]N.W.Al-Hafiz,Mesran,andSuginam,“SistemPendukungKeputusanPenentukanKreditPemilikanRumahMenerapkanMulti-ObjectiveOptimizationontheBasisofRatioAnalysis(Moora),”KOMIK(KonferensiNasionalTeknologiInformatikadanKomputer),vol.I,no.1,pp.306–309,2017.[14]S.Chakraborty,“ApplicationsoftheMOORAmethodfordecisionmakinginmanufacturingenvironment,”Int.J.Adv.Manuf.Technol.,vol.54,no.9–12,pp.1155–1166,2011,doi:10.1007/s00170-010-2972-0.[15]D.Assrani,“PenentuanPenerimaBantuanSiswaMiskinMenerapkanMetodeMultiObjectiveOptimizationonTheBasisofRatioAnalysis(MOORA),”JURIKOM(JurnalRis.Komputer),vol.5,no.2407–389X(MediaCetak),pp.1–5,2018.[16]Ivandari,T.T.Chasanah,andM.A.AlKaromi,“SistemPendukungKeputusanPersetujuanKreditdenganPemanfaatanInformationGainuntukPembobotanAtributKlasifikasiK-NearestNeighbour,”IC-Tech,vol.12,no.2,pp.14–19,2017.[17]A.iA.SyafitriHidayatulAA,YuitaArumS,“SeleksiFiturInformationGainiuntukiKlasifikasiPenyakitJantungMenggunakanKombinasiMetodeK-NearestNeighbordanNaïveBayes,”JurnalPengembanganTeknologiInformasidanIlmuKomputer,vol.2,no.9,pp.2546–2554,2018.


Article metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Indexed by:

 
   

 

Editorial Office:

Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (P3M)
Politeknik Negeri Cilacap
Jln. Dokter Soetomo No.1, Karangcengis Sidakaya Cilacap
Jawa Tengah 53212
Telepon: (0282) 533329
Email: infotekmesin.ejournal@pnc.ac.id

 

   Flag Counter

 

View My Stats

 

Creative Commons License
INFOTEKMESIN is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.